1.  Last but not the least, the arguer unfairly assumes that employees will not wasting time if their computers are detected.

2.  To foster a better work ethic, while productivity is vital, employees' willing to work for the company is much more essential.

3.  To support this recommendation , the vice president cites the following facts that via this electronic monitoring of employees' Internet the employee will spent less working hours on personal or recreational activities .

4.  The arguer fails to bring into notice that if such a facility of using internet would be debarred then out of monotony the employee would not be able to work better which would result in decreased productivity and hence less profits.

5.  The arguer fails to bring into notice that if such a facility of using internet would be debarred then out of monotony the employee would not be able to work better which would result in decreased productivity and hence less profits.

6.  The arguer fails to bring into notice that if such a facility of using internet would be debarred then out of monotony the employee would not be able to work better which would result in decreased productivity and hence fewer profits.

7.  To better evaluate the recommendation, I also need to know how the employees will response when implementing the software.

8.  In order to support his argument, he has to provide more persuasive evidence that the company's employee's will benefits a lot from it.

9.  He/she mainly rests his/her recommendation on the assumption that in this way, the employees would spent more time on their work and their recreational time at work would be reduced which will definitely contributed to the improvement of the company's efficiency of productivity.

10.  If the graduate has a strong personal desire to improve his fast-reading ability, the course's effect on other common employees won't as obvious as on the graduate.