1.  Examining all the various angles and factors involving accidents caused by mopeds, the argument does not justify the proposed restriction.

2.  Maybe the mopeds involving the accidents are private.

3.  If among the mopeds involving an accident, those for rent are the most part, controls on the limits on mopeds rentals will make sense.

4.  On the contrary, if most of the mopeds involving an accident is not for rent, say, private, then other strategy relative to private mopeds will reach the predicted result closer, rather than taking the limitation.

5.  In order to support the recommendation and justify the recommendation effective, the writer must assume that all relevant circumstances involving the traffic accidents are essentially the same.

6.  To bolster the recommendation the writer needs to provide enough evidences that the conditions of the mopeds rented between Seaville and Balmer are the same or similar, and other factors that involving the traffic accidents will remain unchanged, and finally, the restriction of the mopeds rented is effective and necessary.